星空传媒

New pay-transparency requirements for Ontario employers are expected to emerge in the coming months, the latest in a cross-country trend toward stronger protections for workers and job seekers.

First announced earlier this month by the Ministry of Labour as part of the proposed , new rules for employers would include disclosing the use of artificial intelligence in hiring and listing salary ranges in public job postings -- information that was featured on just 37 per cent of Ontario postings in 2022, according to the province.

鈥淎t a time when many companies are posting record profits, it is only fair they communicate transparently about how they pay workers,鈥� said Ontario Labour Minister David Piccini in the announcement.

• Top business headlines, all in one place

In an international survey conducted last year by data firm , 45 per cent of respondents reported that they included a pay range in job postings, but 18 per cent specified that they only did so when required by law.

鈥淭he overall takeaway is that most [organizations] do not appear to be ready for pay transparency laws,鈥� a report on the survey from Payscale reads. 鈥淎dopting pay transparency is a best practice, regardless of the law.鈥�

is a professor emeritus of industrial relations and human-resources management at the University of Toronto. He calls the proposed AI rules 鈥渃ommendable,鈥� and says that so long as it鈥檚 done with the right amount of specificity, the disclosure requirements are a step in the right direction.

鈥淓verywhere that we have tried transparency, it has made things better, not worse,鈥� he said in an interview on Friday with CTVNews.ca.

To Verma, maintaining salary ranges, not dollar amounts, is key to the objectives behind better transparency, and to protecting the privacy of individual workers. Too much specificity, he says, can backfire.

Decades ago, the Ontario government began to publish all salaries over $100,000 for public employees. The intent, Verma described, was to reign in high-end salaries through public pressure, but instead, the move ultimately pushed some salaries higher.

鈥淭he idea was to publicize and prevent such excesses,鈥� Verma said. 鈥淏ut what happened was that when I saw that my colleague, the guy whose office is next door to mine, is making 50 per cent more than I am, I immediately go to my boss and say 鈥� 鈥榟ow do you explain this?鈥欌��

Ultimately, he said, it鈥檚 about striking a balance.

鈥淚t鈥檚 a good idea to have more disclosure, and it鈥檚 good to make it within ranges and for groups of people, rather than for individuals.鈥�

• 5 Things to Know newsletter: Sign up to start your day with the top stories

Ontario joins growing transparency trend

The policy move has Ontario joining three other provinces in a growing trend toward demystifying wage equity.

鈥淭ransparency laws are popular now because they align generally with a trend towards soft touch business regulation,鈥� said , a professor of work law at York University, in an email to CTV News.

鈥淕overnments hope to alter behaviour in pursuit of policy goals, such as reduced pay discrimination, without imposing much cost or administrative burden on employers.鈥�

In November 2021, established its own salary-disclosure requirements on public job postings, followed by a year later and , this May.

In addition, the B.C. and Atlantic-region laws establish new restrictions on how employers can control payment discussions, prohibiting them from asking applicants about their past salaries and from penalizing employees for disclosing their wages amongst themselves.

The latter rule, sometimes called anti-reprisal protections, already exists in Ontario under the Employment Standards Act (ESA).

While business leaders note that B.C.鈥檚 law doesn鈥檛 currently feature penalties, both Atlantic-region laws include potential fines for employers who fail to comply with the transparency requirements.

In Newfoundland and Labrador, individuals may be liable for up to $1,000, with corporations and public bodies potentially subject to a $25,000 fine. P.E.I. employers, meanwhile, could face fines of between $200 and $10,000 under the broader labour laws involved.

Ontario鈥檚 own proposed penalties aren鈥檛 immediately clear, though general violations of the ESA can carry penalties as high as $50,000 in individual fines and $100,000 for corporations, on first offences alone.

In Canada, support for the measures appears widespread. A recent survey by recruiting firm found that 84 per cent of Canadian respondents either greatly or somewhat supported legal requirements for salary ranges in job postings.

The same survey found that just 45 per cent of workers felt they were fairly compensated for their work, and that roughly one in four were considering leaving their job within the next year.

Second time鈥檚 the charm

Working for Workers Four represents a second try at legislating pay transparency at this scale in Ontario. In 2018, the then-Liberal government passed the Pay Transparency Act, carrying the same rules for job postings, salary history and non-reprisal as those in B.C., P.E.I. and Newfoundland and Labrador.

Described at the time as the first legislation of its kind in Canada, the Wynne government highlighted the positive effects of transparency on wage equity for women, empowering them through more informed salary negotiations.

• The information you need to know, sent directly to you: Download the CTV News App

"Pay transparency legislation will not only highlight pay inequities, it will help shift attitudes and biases that prevent women from achieving equal pay for equal work,鈥� said then-minister of the status of women Harinder Malhi.

That incarnation of the law never came into force, as later that same year, the newly elected Ford government shelved it.

Similar proposals were brought by the Manitoba NDP, then its province鈥檚 opposition, in March of 2022. The private-member鈥檚 bill did not advance past first-reading, but since then, the Manitoba NDP have won a majority government in the province.

Edited by CTVNews.ca Special Projects Producer Phil Hahn