TORONTO -- Tweets criticizing Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau have shown evidence of some bot-like activity from Twitter accounts that appear to share American right-wing sentiments, prompting concerns that public opinion could be affected by automated online accounts.
Analysis of about by researcher Marc Owen Jones revealed that 15 per cent of accounts using the hashtag #TrudeauMustGo between Sept. 3 and 5 were ones that primarily identified with U.S. right-wing politics.
The biographies tied to those accounts made mention of 鈥淢ake America Great Again鈥 (MAGA), 鈥淜eep America Great鈥 (KAG), or the QAnon and #WWG1GWA fringe conspiracy theory movements.
鈥淭his community was among the most cohesive on the hashtag, in other words, the thing the accounts most had in common on #TrudeauMustGo was their self-identification with the Trump movement,鈥 Jones, , told CTVNews.ca by email earlier this month from Qatar.
Jones, who has been probing issues of disinformation related to the Brexit, began investigating the hashtag after one of his followers notified him about #TrudeauMustGo.
鈥淚 was surprised the figure of Trump supporters was so high and that they were tweeting on Canadian politics. I was also surprised to see many of the same accounts tweeting about Brexit and Iran. To me that is suspicious,鈥 he added.
Jones also found that the U.S. right-wing accounts using the hashtag were generally more active than other accounts on Twitter, showing evidence of spam or bot-like activity.
History of suspicious activity
Use of #TrudeauMustGo dates back as far as 2015, but the hashtag has been gradually picking up steam since June.
In July, the under the hashtag, reporting that it was 鈥渄riven in part by inauthentic activity including artificial amplification and automation.鈥
The National Observer linked a spike in activity on the hashtag between Jul. 16 and 17 after Trudeau said 鈥渢his is not how we do things in Canada鈥 in response to questions about U.S. President Donald Trump鈥檚 tweets in which he told four U.S. congresswomen to go back to the countries they came from.
According to the report, more than two dozen accounts tweeting from the hashtag in that instance had been created less than two days beforehand and approximately 400 accounts contained the term 鈥淢AGA鈥 in their profile.
Jones is now working with researchers at Citizen Lab, an internet watchdog group based at the University of Toronto's Munk School, to better understand the scale of the operation.
How does this affect you?
Despite these reports, #TrudeauMustGo and related hashtags such as #TrudeauMustGoToJail and #TrudeauCorruption, are shared by real Twitter users every day as the election campaign ramps up.
Hundreds of those users have tweeted, specifying that they are not bots, but real people who oppose Trudeau and his party鈥檚 politics.
But experts warn that any spam or bot-like manipulation can further polarize the electorate and even influence the election.
鈥淭here鈥檚 no doubt about it; the only question is how much and how do we measure that,鈥 told CTVNews.caon Tuesday.
鈥淏asically what you are dealing with is the distortion of the public debate.鈥
Scott led the technology policy advisory group for the Hillary Clinton campaign during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. His work focuses on research and policy analysis related to digital disinformation in democracies.
Speaking to CTVNews.ca by telephone from London, Scott said Jones鈥 estimation of the number of bot-like accounts tweeting under the #TrudeauMustGo hashtag is high, noting this has 鈥渢he potential to disrupt the political debate鈥 in Canada.
He also noted that among hyper-polarized communities, 80 per cent of the sharing, commenting, and retweeting of a particular hashtag happens within a small segment of the population, further polarizing the audience for whichit鈥檚 deemed relevant.
鈥淲hen it happens over and over again it gradually changes your world view and politics,鈥 said Scott.
Alexei Abrahams, who has been helping Jones collect data on the #TrudeauMustGo hashtag, adds that the spamming and manipulation of hashtags can create increased skepticism about what people read online, forcing people to retreat back to their personal biases.
鈥淎bsent of any clear way of seeing whether something is manipulated or not, people tend to go back to their home-spun values and it鈥檚 harder for them to be responsive to new information,鈥 Abrahams told CTVNews.ca by phone from Toronto last week.
鈥淵ou reach a place, when you鈥檙e exposed to so much misinformation, that you鈥檙e agnostic towards any sort of information. It ultimately leads to a sort of withdrawal from political life and from the activity of inquiring, because you just become frustrated and skeptical, then ultimately disenchanted.鈥
- Edited by Producer Phil Hahn and Senior Producer Mary Nersessian.
Contact us
See a story or post circulating on social media that you think may be disinformation or in need of fact-checking?
Let us know by sharing with us the link to the post or the source of the information.
Email us by clicking here or visit our Newsbreaker page.
Please include your full name, city and province.
